U.S. exchanges defeat high-frequency trading lawsuit

NEW YORK, March 28 (Reuters) – A federal decide on Monday dismissed long-running litigation accusing seven U.S. inventory exchanges of defrauding atypical buyers by quietly permitting high-frequency merchants to commerce sooner and at higher costs.

Exchanges together with the New York Inventory Alternate, Nasdaq (NDAQ.O) and BATS International Markets had been accused of offering high-frequency buying and selling corporations with enhanced information feeds and sooner order processing, and letting them find their servers close to the exchanges’ personal so buying and selling alerts can be despatched sooner.

However in a 46-page resolution, U.S. District Decide Jesse Furman in Manhattan stated buyers within the proposed class motion couldn’t show they suffered hurt due to the exchanges’ actions, which they stated violated federal securities legislation.

The decide stated experiences from the plaintiffs’ knowledgeable witness, a former high-frequency dealer who now consults on market construction, had been “not primarily based on dependable methodology,” and didn’t monitor the buying and selling corporations’ use of the specialised providers.

As a result of these experiences had been inadmissible, “it follows that plaintiffs have adduced no admissible proof that their very own trades had been harmed by the exchanges’ challenged conduct,” depriving them of authorized standing to sue, Furman wrote.

The buyers had been led by the town of Windfall, Rhode Island and several other pension plans, together with for the town of Boston. Their legal professionals didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Excessive-frequency merchants use laptop algorithms to achieve split-second buying and selling benefits.

They had been the topic of Michael Lewis’ best-seller “Flash Boys,” printed in March 2014. The lawsuit started the subsequent month.

The NYSE and its guardian Intercontinental Alternate Inc (ICE.N) stated they had been happy with the choice. Neither the opposite defendants nor their legal professionals supplied feedback. BATS is now a part of CBOE International Markets Inc .

Furman had additionally dismissed the buyers’ claims in 2015, discovering the exchanges completely immune from legal responsibility below federal legislation, however an appeals courtroom overturned that discovering two years later.

The case is Metropolis of Windfall, Rhode Island et al v BATS International Markets Inc et al, U.S. District Courtroom, Southern District of New York, No. 14-02811.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Modifying by Aurora Ellis, Bernard Orr

: .